Author: Humble Chirammal (Red Hat), Louis Koo (deeproute.ai)
Kubernetes v1.25, released earlier this month, introduced a new feature that lets your cluster expand storage volumes, even when access to those volumes requires a secret (for example: a credential for accessing a SAN fabric) to perform node expand operation. This new behavior is in alpha and you must enable a feature gate (CSINodeExpandSecret) to make use of it. You must also be using CSIstorage; this change isn't relevant to storage drivers that are built in to Kubernetes.
To turn on this new, alpha feature, you enable the CSINodeExpandSecret feature gate for the kube-apiserver and kubelet, which turns on a mechanism to send secretRefconfiguration as part of NodeExpansion by the CSI drivers thus make use of the same to perform node side expansion operation with the underlying storage system.
What is this all about?
Before Kubernetes v1.24, you were able to define a cluster-level StorageClass that made use of StorageClass Secrets, but you didn't have any mechanism to specify the credentials that would be used for operations that take place when the storage was mounted onto a node and when the volume has to be expanded at node side.
The Kubernetes CSI already implemented a similar mechanism specific kinds of volume resizes; namely, resizes of PersistentVolumes where the resizes take place independently from any node referred as Controller Expansion. In that case, you associate a PersistentVolume with a Secret that contains credentials for volume resize actions, so that controller expansion can take place. CSI also supports a nodeExpandVolumeoperation which CSI drivers can make use independent of Controller Expansion or along with Controller Expansion on which, where the resize is driven from a node in your cluster where the volume is attached. Please read Kubernetes 1.24: Volume Expansion Now A Stable Feature
At times, the CSI driver needs to check the actual size of the backend block storage (or image) before proceeding with a node-level filesystem expand operation. This avoids false positive returns from the backend storage cluster during filesystem expands.
When a PersistentVolume represents encrypted block storage (for example using LUKS) you need to provide a passphrase in order to expand the device, and also to make it possible to grow the filesystem on that device.
For various validations at time of node expansion, the CSI driver has to be connected to the backend storage cluster. If the
nodeExpandVolumerequest includes asecretRefthen the CSI driver can make use of the same and connect to the storage cluster to perform the cluster operations.
How does it work?
To enable this functionality from this version of Kubernetes, SIG Storage have introduced a new feature gate called CSINodeExpandSecret. Once the feature gate is enabled in the cluster, NodeExpandVolume requests can include a secretRef field. The NodeExpandVolume request is part of CSI; for example, in a request which has been sent from the Kubernetes control plane to the CSI driver.
As a cluster operator, you admin can specify these secrets as an opaque parameter in a StorageClass, the same way that you can already specify other CSI secret data. The StorageClass needs to have some CSI-specific parameters set. Here's an example of those parameters:
csi.storage.k8s.io/node-expand-secret-name: test-secret
csi.storage.k8s.io/node-expand-secret-namespace: default
If feature gates are enabled and storage class carries the above secret configuration, the CSI provisioner receives the credentials from the Secret as part of the NodeExpansion request.
CSI volumes that require secrets for online expansion will have NodeExpandSecretRef field set. If not set, the NodeExpandVolume CSI RPC call will be made without a secret.
Trying it out
Enable the
CSINodeExpandSecretfeature gate (please refer toFeature Gates).Create a Secret, and then a StorageClass that uses that Secret.
Here's an example manifest for a Secret that holds credentials:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
name: test-secret
namespace: default
data:
stringData:
username: admin
password: t0p-Secret
Here's an example manifest for a StorageClass that refers to those credentials:
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1
kind: StorageClass
metadata:
name: csi-blockstorage-sc
parameters:
csi.storage.k8s.io/node-expand-secret-name: test-secret # the name of the Secret
csi.storage.k8s.io/node-expand-secret-namespace: default # the namespace that the Secret is in
provisioner: blockstorage.cloudprovider.example
reclaimPolicy: Delete
volumeBindingMode: Immediate
allowVolumeExpansion: true
Example output
If the PersistentVolumeClaim (PVC) was created successfully, you can see that configuration within the spec.csi field of the PersistentVolume (look forspec.csi.nodeExpandSecretRef). Check that it worked by running kubectl get persistentvolume <pv_name> -o yaml. You should see something like.
apiVersion: v1
kind: PersistentVolume
metadata:
annotations:
pv.kubernetes.io/provisioned-by: blockstorage.cloudprovider.example
creationTimestamp: "2022-08-26T15:14:07Z"
finalizers:
- kubernetes.io/pv-protection
name: pvc-95eb531a-d675-49f6-940b-9bc3fde83eb0
resourceVersion: "420263"
uid: 6fa824d7-8a06-4e0c-b722-d3f897dcbd65
spec:
accessModes:
- ReadWriteOnce
capacity:
storage: 6Gi
claimRef:
apiVersion: v1
kind: PersistentVolumeClaim
name: csi-pvc
namespace: default
resourceVersion: "419862"
uid: 95eb531a-d675-49f6-940b-9bc3fde83eb0
csi:
driver: blockstorage.cloudprovider.example
nodeExpandSecretRef:
name: test-secret
namespace: default
volumeAttributes:
storage.kubernetes.io/csiProvisionerIdentity: 1648042783218-8081-blockstorage.cloudprovider.example
volumeHandle: e21c7809-aabb-11ec-917a-2e2e254eb4cf
nodeAffinity:
required:
nodeSelectorTerms:
- matchExpressions:
- key: topology.hostpath.csi/node
operator: In
values:
- racknode01
persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: Delete
storageClassName: csi-blockstorage-sc
volumeMode: Filesystem
status:
phase: Bound
If you then trigger online storage expansion, the kubelet passes the appropriate credentials to the CSI driver, by loading that Secret and passing the data to the storage driver.
Here's an example debug log:
I0330 03:29:51.966241 1 server.go:101] GRPC call: /csi.v1.Node/NodeExpandVolume
I0330 03:29:51.966261 1 server.go:105] GRPC request: {"capacity_range":{"required_bytes":7516192768},"secrets":" ***stripped***","staging_target_path":"/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/csi/blockstorage.cloudprovider.example/f7c62e6e08ce21e9b2a95c841df315ed4c25a15e91d8fcaf20e1c2305e5300ab/globalmount","volume_capability":{"AccessType":{"Mount":{}},"access_mode":{"mode":7}},"volume_id":"e21c7809-aabb-11ec-917a-2e2e254eb4cf","volume_path":"/var/lib/kubelet/pods/bcb1b2c4-5793-425c-acf1-47163a81b4d7/volumes/kubernetes.io~csi/pvc-95eb531a-d675-49f6-940b-9bc3fde83eb0/mount"}
I0330 03:29:51.966360 1 nodeserver.go:459] req:volume_id:"e21c7809-aabb-11ec-917a-2e2e254eb4cf" volume_path:"/var/lib/kubelet/pods/bcb1b2c4-5793-425c-acf1-47163a81b4d7/volumes/kubernetes.io~csi/pvc-95eb531a-d675-49f6-940b-9bc3fde83eb0/mount" capacity_range:<required_bytes:7516192768 > staging_target_path:"/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/csi/blockstorage.cloudprovider.example/f7c62e6e08ce21e9b2a95c841df315ed4c25a15e91d8fcaf20e1c2305e5300ab/globalmount" volume_capability:<mount:<> access_mode:<mode:SINGLE_NODE_MULTI_WRITER > > secrets:<key:"XXXXXX" value:"XXXXX" > secrets:<key:"XXXXX" value:"XXXXXX" >
The future
As this feature is still in alpha, Kubernetes Storage SIG expect to update or get feedback from CSI driver authors with more tests and implementation. The community plans to eventually promote the feature to Beta in upcoming releases.
Get involved or learn more?
The enhancement proposal includes lots of detail about the history and technical implementation of this feature.
To learn more about StorageClass based dynamic provisioning in Kubernetes, please refer toStorage Classes andPersistent Volumes.
Please get involved by joining the KubernetesStorage SIG(Special Interest Group) to help us enhance this feature. There are a lot of good ideas already and we'd be thrilled to have more!
Top comments (0)