Goglides Dev 🌱

Goglides Dev 🌱 is a community of amazing users

We are working on this space so that IT professionals can grow together.

Create account Log in
kubernetesio
kubernetesio

Posted on • Originally published at kubernetes.io on

Blog: Kubernetes v1.26: CPUManager goes GA

Author: Francesco Romani (Red Hat)

The CPU Manager is a part of the kubelet, the Kubernetes node agent, which enables the user to allocate exclusive CPUs to containers. Since Kubernetes v1.10, where it graduated to Beta, the CPU Manager proved itself reliable and fulfilled its role of allocating exclusive CPUs to containers, so adoption has steadily grown making it a staple component of performance-critical and low-latency setups. Over time, most changes were about bugfixes or internal refactoring, with the following noteworthy user-visible changes:

The CPU Manager reached the point on which it "just works", so in Kubernetes v1.26 it has graduated to generally available (GA).

Customization options for CPU Manager

The CPU Manager supports two operation modes, configured using its policies. With the none policy, the CPU Manager allocates CPUs to containers without any specific constraint except the (optional) quota set in the Pod spec. With the static policy, then provided that the pod is in the Guaranteed QoS class and every container in that Pod requests an integer amount of vCPU cores, then the CPU Manager allocates CPUs exclusively. Exclusive assignment means that other containers (whether from the same Pod, or from a different Pod) do not get scheduled onto that CPU.

This simple operational model served the user base pretty well, but as the CPU Manager matured more and more, users started to look at more elaborate use cases and how to better support them.

Rather than add more policies, the community realized that pretty much all the novel use cases are some variation of the behavior enabled by the staticCPU Manager policy. Hence, it was decided to add options to tune the behavior of the static policy. The options have a varying degree of maturity, like any other Kubernetes feature, and in order to be accepted, each new option provides a backward compatible behavior when disabled, and to document how to interact with each other, should they interact at all.

This enabled the Kubernetes project to graduate to GA the CPU Manager core component and core CPU allocation algorithms to GA, while also enabling a new age of experimentation in this area. In Kubernetes v1.26, the CPU Manager supports three different policy options:

full-pcpus-only
restrict the CPU Manager core allocation algorithm to full physical cores only, reducing noisy neighbor issues from hardware technologies that allow sharing cores.
distribute-cpus-across-numa
drive the CPU Manager to evenly distribute CPUs across NUMA nodes, for cases where more than one NUMA node is required to satisfy the allocation.
align-by-socket
change how the CPU Manager allocates CPUs to a container: consider CPUs to be aligned at the socket boundary, instead of NUMA node boundary.

Further development

After graduating the main CPU Manager feature, each existing policy option will follow their graduation process, independent from CPU Manager and from each other option. There is room for new options to be added, but there's also a growing demand for even more flexibility than what the CPU Manager, and its policy options, currently grant.

Conversations are in progress in the community about splitting the CPU Manager and the other resource managers currently part of the kubelet executable into pluggable, independent kubelet plugins. If you are interested in this effort, please join the conversation on SIG Node communication channels (Slack, mailing list, weekly meeting).

Further reading

Please check out the Control CPU Management Policies on the Nodetask page to learn more about the CPU Manager, and how it fits in relation to the other node-level resource managers.

Getting involved

This feature is driven by the SIG Node community. Please join us to connect with the community and share your ideas and feedback around the above feature and beyond. We look forward to hearing from you!

Discussion (0)